gif1

gif1

GLORY

GLORY

to GOD

to GOD

lib media

BEWARE OF LIBERAL MEDIA:

WASHINGTON POST, NY TIMES,MSNBC, and many many more. they will tell you only lies & propaganda

Trump Make America Great Again Committee

My Blog List

Thursday, November 12, 2026

Fwd: You Can't Make This Up : One of the Lowest Ranked Soldiers Rebukes the Highest in Command & Gets Commended for it



Gemini_Generated_Image_mypivkmypivkmypi.jpg

The Unlikely Salute: How a Junior Sentinel Reprimanded the Nation's Top Defense Chief and Gets Commended for it !  


The polished marble of Arlington National Cemetery gleamed under the crisp autumn light as the steady, deliberate footsteps of the sentinel echoed across the plaza. For Specialist Brian Iglesias, an elite infantryman of the 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment—the storied Old Guard—the mission was absolute and unchanging. To him, the rank on a person's collar, the prestige of their office, or the power they wielded outside those hallowed grounds meant nothing. Here, the sacred silence of the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier reigned supreme, demanding absolute reverence for the fallen who gave everything.

As an official delegation approached the monument, a group paused by the barrier to take photographs. Among them was Pete Hegseth, the civilian Secretary of Defense—the supreme leader of the United States Armed Forces, outranking every general, admiral, and soldier in uniform, though his own past military service had concluded at the rank of Major. Amidst the solemn quiet, voices drifted across the hallowed stones, breaking the strict protocol of silence required at the shrine.

Instantly, the sentinel's training took over. Without a flicker of hesitation, Iglesias executed a sharp pivot, locked his eyes forward, and delivered a booming, uncompromising reprimand that pierced the air:

"All visitors will maintain an atmosphere of silence and respect at all times."

A hush fell over the plaza. The man who held the highest authority over the nation's 1.3 million active-duty service members had just been publicly called to order by a junior enlisted specialist. In many organizations, such a rebuke from a subordinate might spell career disaster. But in the proud, unyielding tradition of the Old Guard, standards are paramount. Rather than taking offense or pulling rank, Hegseth recognized the absolute integrity of the moment. He understood that the sentinels protect a dignity far greater than any cabinet post or political title. 

A day later, Hegseth invited Specialist Iglesias to the Pentagon, not for a reprimand, but to present him with the Joint Service Commendation Medal. Sharing the moment online, Hegseth captured the spirit of the day with a simple, resounding endorsement: "We love soldiers. We love standards. Well done, Specialist. Carry on Patriots."

It is a striking modern testament to an enduring American ideal: that while civilian leaders hold the highest seats of power, the truest strength of the military lies in the unwavering discipline of those who guard its most sacred trusts, treating every visitor—from a weary tourist to the Secretary of Defense himself—with the exact same unyielding standard of respect.

Wednesday, November 11, 2026

Video: #VeteransDay 🪖 Parade 2026, #SomeGaveAll ✝️🙏🇺🇸 Thanks for your Service 👍


#VeteransDay 🪖 
Parade 2026
#SomeGaveAll ✝️🙏🇺🇸
Thanks for your Service 👍
God Bless America 🇺🇸
America Bless God ✝️

San Jose California 

Tuesday, November 10, 2026

"Manning: Trump's Unwillingness to Forgive His Enemies Might Be More Biblical Than Many People Think"

The author of the article asks whether it is a sin to not forgive and shows one biblical pattern that would seem to suggest it's not a sin to not forgive,
  if the person is not repentant

"Christ lays out the pattern as “sin, rebuke, repentance, forgiveness.” The forgiveness doesn’t come before the repentance. Now, there is a valid counter-position that models the process as forgiveness first and then a reconciliation once the person asks forgiveness. Fair enough. We’re not trying to stake an absolute claim here. We’re exploring whether there’s a case – a case – for Trump’s unforgiveness to co-exist with a faith in Christ..."


https://www.westernjournal.com/manning-trumps-unwillingness-forgive-enemies-might-biblical-many-people-think/ 

Friday, November 6, 2026

"WAYNE ROOT: Something Smells Rotten in Texas. And Kansas. And Mississippi. And Everywhere Else Too. .."


Uploaded Image

The Grand Illusion of 2026

Wayne Allyn Root argues that the 2026 midterm election results were fundamentally fraudulent, characterizing the outcomes as a repeated script of the 2020 presidential race.

 His core contention is that a massive, coordinated manipulation occurred to artificially create Democratic victories in heavily conservative territory.

Root claims that the narrow Democratic takeover of the House and historic flipped seats in states like Texas, Kansas, and Mississippi are statistically impossible. 

He asserts that the victory of Gina Hinojosa over Greg Abbott in Texas and the Senate wins by James Talarico and Adam Hamilton could not have happened through legitimate voting patterns.

His argument rests on three specific assertions:

First, he claims that mail-in voting and extended ballot counting timelines were intentionally used to inject artificial votes after election night.

Second, he argues that mainstream polling data showing late Democratic momentum was entirely fabricated ahead of time to justify and cover up the eventual manufactured outcomes.

Third, he contends that the massive voter turnout numbers reported in traditionally red districts do not reflect real voters, but rather an inflation of voter rolls designed to overwhelm conservative majorities.

Conversely, election administrators and independent analysts state that the 2026 results were the product of changing suburban demographics, high authentic voter engagement, and distinct candidate dynamics rather than systemic interference.

Links:




https://www.google.com/search?q=WAYNE+ROOT%3A+Something+Smells+Rotten+in+Texas.+And+Kansas.+And+Mississippi.+And+Everywhere+Else+Too.+Was+This+a+2020+Rigged+Election+All+Over+Again%3F+Here+are+a+Few+Simple+Questions+About+This+Midterm+Election.%0ABy+Wayne+Allyn+&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

Thursday, November 5, 2026

Call me Mr Veto : "President Trump Sends Democrats A One-Word Warning After Midterms" IF they don't play ball


Uploaded Image
President Trump Ready to Work with Democrats for Bipartisan Deals

Following the November 3, 2026 midterm elections, adopting the moniker Mr. Veto, the President noted that while he will use his veto power to keep legislation aligned with his platform, his ultimate goal is to bring Democratic leaders to the negotiating table. 

He predicts this strategic balance will successfully pave the way for major bipartisan deals that benefit the entire country. Will the lefties play ball or will they act like spoiled spiteful brats as usual?! 

Our country  needs more than just extreme radical partisan politics at this time.  Help make us a better country 🇺🇸✝️🗽🙏





https://www.google.com/search?q=President+Trump+Sends+Democrats+A+One-Word+Warning+After+Midterm+Sweep%0ABy+Jack+%7C+Nov+4%2C+2026%0A0%0ASHARES%0A&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

Shame On Gay California Congressman Robert Garcia's Sniper Shot at Trump  re 'Lawyer Up" 👎😡



A New Era of Oversight: 
The Clash Over Congressional Rhetoric

The statement by House Oversight Committee Chair Representative Robert Garcia instructing Trump administration officials to lawyer up has drawn significant public criticism from political opponents, conservative commentators, and constitutional legal analysts.

Opponents argue that the comment is inappropriate, un-American, and unacceptable for several key reasons:

Undermining the 
Presumption of Innocence

Critics argue that demanding public officials lawyer up before any formal hearings or evidence have been presented actively subverts the foundational American legal principle of the presumption of innocence. By implying automatic guilt, the rhetoric is viewed as a partisan weapon rather than a pursuit of justice.

Weaponizing Congressional Oversight

Detractors state that congressional oversight committees are constitutionally mandated to serve as independent fact-finding bodies to ensure government accountability. Using aggressive, preemptive language suggests that the incoming committee's primary goal is political retaliation and theater rather than objective, bipartisan investigation.

Deepening Political Polarization
Commentators argue that leveling such targeted rhetorical shots at a sitting or incoming president and their administration degrades civil discourse and erodes public trust in government institutions.

 Critics view it as a continuation of hyper-partisan warfare that prioritizes scoring cheap political points over governance and national unity.

Prejudging Investigative Outcomes

Legal analysts point out that declaring a need for legal defense before investigations even begin signals that the committee has already reached its conclusions. This undermines the credibility of any legitimate findings the committee might produce in the future, framing the entire process as a predetermined political exercise.

Links:
Official Website: https://house.gov
Committee on Oversight: https://house.gov



https://www.google.com/search?q=House+Oversight+Committee+Chair+Rep.+Robert+Garcia&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Showdown:  💪 Washington versus International Court ⚖️

 

The conflict between the International Criminal Court and the Trump administration represents a fundamental clash between supranational judicial authority and state sovereignty.

 Evaluating the accusations requires analyzing the core arguments from both the tribunal and the United States government, alongside the broader perspective of the international community.

The ICC Perspective: 
Obstruction of International Justice

According to ICC President Judge Tomoko Akane, the sweeping economic penalties imposed by the Trump administration constitute an extraordinary and unprecedented attempt to subdue a sovereign judicial institution. The tribunal and its supporters base their accusations on several key arguments.

 First, they point to financial and operational sabotage. The October 2026 sanctions target the entire court, prohibiting American organizations and companies from providing services to it. 

Because the global financial system relies heavily on United States infrastructure, these measures threaten to freeze assets, disrupt essential communications, and prevent international banks from doing business with the tribunal. The court argues this is a deliberate effort to block its operational capacity. 

Second, the ICC maintains that the United States is using coercive measures to force independent judicial actors to abandon legal investigations by placing direct asset freezes, travel bans, and restrictions on ICC judges, prosecutors, and their associates.

 Finally, the court and human rights organizations argue that targeting a court of last resort establishes a dangerous precedent where powerful states can grant themselves and their allies immunity from accountability for severe international crimes.

The Trump Administration Perspective: Defense of Sovereignty

The Trump administration, led by statements from Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, rejects the legitimacy of the ICC actions and frames its sanctions as a necessary defense of national independence. 
Their defense centers on three main counterarguments. 

First, they emphasize a lack of jurisdiction, noting that the United States is not a party to the Rome Statute that established the court. The administration argues that the tribunal has no authority to investigate or prosecute citizens of the United States or non-member allies like Israel because those nations never consented to its jurisdiction. 

Second, the administration accuses the court of severe politicization. Secretary Rubio has called the tribunal a rogue, corrupt, and fatally politicized supranational court that engages in lawfare. The administration asserts that the court investigations, specifically regarding United States personnel in Afghanistan and arrest warrants issued for Israeli leaders, are politically motivated assaults on democratic nations with their own robust legal systems capable of handling internal misconduct.

 Finally, the United States asserts that the ICC overreach threatens active service members and officials with arbitrary international arrest and harassment, justifying aggressive economic measures to protect its citizens.

The International Community Stance

The broader international response heavily favors the ICC position, though there are notable exceptions. Traditional United States allies, including the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Japan, have explicitly disagreed with Washington's approach.

 While they value their relationship with the United States, they have reaffirmed their commitment to the tribunal, warning that the sanctions undermine the international rule of law.

 Conversely, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu strongly praised the Trump administration's intervention, echoing the sentiment that the ICC is a heavily politicized body abusing its authority.

Conclusion
Whether the Trump administration's actions are considered obstruction of justice or a defense of sovereignty depends on one's framework of international law. 

To proponents of global accountability, the United States sanctions are an aggressive effort to paralyze an independent court. To proponents of state nationalism, the measures are a legitimate use of domestic power to halt an un-elected global body from overstepping its bounds.

Links:
The Washington Post: https://washingtonpost.com
International Criminal Court: https://icc-cpi.int



https://www.google.com/search?q=The+president+of+the+International+Criminal+Court+accused+the+Trump+administration+of+trying+to+obstruct+international+justice+by+imposing+penalties+on+the+tribunal+and+vowed+that+it+would+not+succeed.&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

Sunday, November 1, 2026

Maddening 😡: The Department of Justice has estimated that 20,000 "likely aliens" are on California rolls, ..


"...but state officials are pushing back against efforts to remove any ballots they may submit. 

Yes, I can attest to this:

In California, for example, they have automatic voter registration. When you go in to get a driver’s license, they don’t ask you, ‘Would you also like to register to vote?’ The state of California just automatically registers you, and when you ask them, they say, ‘Well, it’s up to the individuals to tell us they’re not eligible to vote,” he said.


******
Summary of the 
Department of Justice Actions

The U.S. Department of Justice initiated a federal lawsuit against California based on data suggesting that over 20,000 potentially ineligible individuals were registered on the state voter rolls. The administration filed this lawsuit to safeguard election integrity and prevent the dilution of votes cast by legal citizens.

Arguments and Actions 
by the Administration

To ensure a fair election process, federal prosecutors requested that local election officials temporarily segregate the flagged ballots. This measure was intended to allow time for citizenship status verification before the ballots were mixed into the final count and became impossible to track. 

Federal officials criticized California election administrators for resisting oversight and failing to utilize available federal resources to verify the accuracy of their databases. The administration argued that the state's reliance on self-attestation for voter registration, combined with its refusal to cooperate with federal inquiries, left the system vulnerable to unauthorized voting. 

Following initial legal setbacks, the administration continued its enforcement efforts by issuing grand jury subpoenas to local election offices, reminding administrators of their responsibility to uphold federal election standards.

Official Links

Department of Justice Suing California: https://justice.gov



https://www.google.com/search?q=The+Department+of+Justice+has+estimated+that+20%2C000+%22likely+aliens%22+are+on+California+rolls%2C+but+state+officials+are+pushing+back+against+efforts+to+remove+any+ballots+they+may+submit.&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

Saturday, October 31, 2026

Surface-to-air missile counter- unmanned aircraft systems (C-UAS) have been set up at Mar-a-Lago

The U.S. Secret Service, alongside NORAD and U.S. Northern Command, has deployed ground-based air defense and counter-drone systems in Palm Beach County, Florida.

Key Details of the Deployment
• Locations: Surface-to-air missile and counter-unmanned aircraft systems (C-UAS) have been set up in and around Mar-a-Lago (including on a floating platform or barge in Lake Worth Lagoon) and at the Donald J. Trump International Airport in West Palm Beach.

• Equipment: Military assets deployed include AN/TWQ-1 Avenger Air Defense Systems, which are designed to counter aerial threats such as drones and aircraft.

• Reason: Officials cited a heightened threat environment, though specific threat details have not been publicly disclosed.

• Context: The deployment follows recent airspace activity in the area, including an incident where a fighter jet intercepted a civilian aircraft that breached restricted airspace near Mar-a-Lago.
Links
• Yahoo News: yahoo.com
• Western Journal: westernjournal.com




https://www.google.com/search?q=The+U.S.+Secret+Service+is+operating+in+a+heightened+threat+environment%2C+and+we+continuously+adapt+our+protective+operations+to+incorporate+cutting-edge+tools%2C+technology%2C+and+methods+to+safeguard+our+protectees%2C%E2%80%9D+the+statement+said.%0A%0A%E2%80%9CAt+the+request+of+the+U.S.+Secret+Service%2C+NORAD+and+U.S.+Northern+Command+are+providing+Counter-Unmanned+Aircraft+System+capabilities+in+support+of+our+protective+operations%2C%E2%80%9D+the+statement+said.&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

Butler: "Heroic Crack Shot Local Cop Sniper Who Saved Trump's Life 'Erased' from News by Embarrassed Feds: Family"

"In less than six seconds after the first shot was fired from 115 yards away, Sgt. Zaliponi acquired his target and fired a single accurate round, stopping the threat,” Sunday added.

Zaliponi told the task force, “I knew I hit him… I have combat experience. His demeanor… there was that jerking motion… he kind of jerked down to my left, his right. Then he slowly rolled like he just had no strength, whatever.”

Crooks did not fire again after being hit. The panel found that 10 seconds elapsed until a Secret Service sniper killed the would-be assassin.."
...



https://www.westernjournal.com/heroic-crack-shot-local-cop-sniper-saved-trumps-life-erased-news-embarrassed-feds-family/ 

Friday, October 30, 2026

Alaska’s Senate ' Decoy' Candidate Dan Sullivan allegedly Refused to Go Under Oath .


"DOJ Issues Flurry of Subpoenas in Expanding Criminal Investigation"
 original article By Cristina Laila at Gateway Pundit - 


The Department of Justice (DOJ) has escalated an expanding criminal and civil probe into the 2026 Alaska U.S. Senate race following a New York Times report detailing alleged efforts to recruit a second candidate named Dan Sullivan to run against Republican incumbent Sen. Dan S. Sullivan.

Key Developments:

The Investigation and Subpoenas: The DOJ issued dozens of new grand jury subpoenas and record preservation notices targeting Democratic officials, the campaign of Democratic candidate Mary Peltola, and retired schoolteacher Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. (the second candidate on the ballot).

Refusal Under Oath: Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy stated that Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. refused to go under oath during the initial phases of state-level inquiries into his candidacy.

Civil Lawsuit and "Conspiracy" Claims: The Trump administration amended a federal civil lawsuit—seeking to block certification of the Alaska Senate race if the Republican incumbent loses—adding allegations of a "conspiracy to undermine the integrity of the electoral process" tied to the reporting.

Denials: The Peltola campaign and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) have denied any involvement in or coordination with the effort to put Daniel J. Sullivan on the ballot.

 Daniel S. Sullivan has maintained that his opponent's entry was designed to confuse voters, though the Alaska Supreme Court previously ruled that Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. was qualified to remain on the ballot.



https://www.google.com/search?q=Alaska%E2%80%99s+Senate+Decoy+Candidate+Dan+Sullivan+Refuses+to+Go+Under+Oath+as+DOJ+Issues+Flurry+of+Subpoenas+in+Expanding+Criminal+Investigation%0ABy+Cristina+Laila+&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

Wednesday, October 28, 2026

"Trump’s social media post on golf course leads lawyers back to court - "

U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes ordered Justice Department lawyers back to court after President Donald Trump posted on social media that the East Potomac Golf Course would close immediately and undergo 15 months of renovations, contradicting prior arguments from government attorneys that no final plan existed.

Key Details of the Case

- The Court Order: Judge Reyes directed Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward Jr. to appear for a status hearing on Friday or Monday to clarify whether a plan actually exists to close the historic public golf course on or around November 15, 2026.

- The Contradiction: While Trump announced on social media that construction would begin immediately and that plans were completed, DOJ lawyers previously told the court that no final redevelopment plan had been finalized. 

Judge Reyes questioned whether the court and the public are supposed to believe the sitting president's public statements or his lawyers' arguments in court.

- The Injunction: A temporary preliminary injunction currently blocks the administration from removing or damaging additional trees at the East Potomac Golf Course and mandates 10 days' written notice before making any irreparable changes.

- The Lawsuit: The DC Preservation League and local golfers filed the challenge, arguing that unannounced tree clearing (over 400 trees removed over a holiday weekend) has caused irreversible damage and that commercial redesigns will harm public access.

Links:



https://www.google.com/search?q=Who+should+be+believed%3F+Trump%E2%80%99s+social+media+post+on+golf+course+leads+lawyers+back+to+court&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

Grand jury declines to indict former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson for lying

Cassidy Hutchinson did not admit that she lied. Throughout the Justice Department investigation, she steadfastly maintained that her 2022 congressional testimony regarding Donald Trump and his inner circle was entirely truthful.

Tony Ornato testified under oath that he did not recall the conversation or the incident occurring. 

When questioned by the House January 6 Committee during a closed-door deposition, Ornato stated that he had no memory of the conversation Cassidy Hutchinson described. He also stated that he did not recall the story itself happening or having any knowledge of Donald Trump exhibiting that level of physical anger inside the vehicle. 

The Key Takeaways
 from Ornato's Response
- Denied Telling the Story: According to sources close to the Secret Service and investigative transcripts, Ornato denied ever telling Hutchinson that Trump lunged at an agent or grabbed the steering wheel.

- No Memory Defense: In his official November 2022 testimony, Ornato stated that he relayed that this is not a story he recollects and he does not recall that story happening.

- Supported by Secret Service Personnel: Ornato’s recollection aligned with testimonies from the Secret Service detail. Bobby Engel (the lead agent in the car) and the presidential SUV's driver both testified that while Trump was visibly angry and insisted on going to the Capitol, he never lunged or grabbed the steering wheel.



https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2026/10/27/grand-jury-refuses-to-indict-former-white-house-aide/9241793148322/ 

Tuesday, October 27, 2026

👍"Federal Judge Orders $2,100 Refund For Pardoned Jan. 6 Defendant"

"a federal judge on Monday ordered the government to refund $2,100 in financial penalties to Capitol riot defendant Larry Brock, ruling that the overturning of his felony conviction stripped prosecutors of the legal right to keep the money.."


https://www.tampafp.com/federal-judge-orders-2100-refund-for-pardoned-jan-6-defendant/ 

"James Comey charged for a third time by the Trump administration -"

On Monday, October 26, 2026, the Department of Justice filed a criminal information charging former FBI Director James Comey with transmission of national defense information and conspiracy to transmit national defense information. 

This marks the third federal case brought against Comey by the Trump administration. According to the unsealed court documents, the charges stem from allegations that in October 2016, Comey directed his staff to share classified national security information with a New York Times reporter to correct misinformation in a Reuters article regarding email surveillance.

Key Legal and Factual Details

- Procedural Mechanism: Instead of obtaining an indictment from a grand jury, prosecutors filed a two-count criminal information. Legal experts note that an information typically requires a defendant's consent and cannot be used by the government to try a defendant unless they waive their right to a grand jury.

- Statute of Limitations Challenge: The alleged conduct took place in October 2016, meaning the 10-year statute of limitations was set to expire on October 5, 2026. The case was kept under seal since October 5, leading critics and legal analysts to describe the filing as an improper attempt to end-run the expiration date.

- Comey's Defense: Comey's attorney, Patrick Fitzgerald, stated that the underlying allegations have already been investigated twice by prosecutors with no charges brought either time. Comey responded in a video message, maintaining his innocence and calling the charges an appalling abuse of the Department of Justice.

- Timing: The filing was unsealed shortly after a federal judge in New York ruled that the Trump administration had unlawfully fired Comey's daughter, Maurene Comey, from her position as a federal civil service prosecutor.

Context of Previous 
Cases Against Comey

The Department of Justice has launched two other criminal cases against Comey since last year, yielding a mixed record in court:

1. Congressional Testimony Case (Dismissed): In September 2025, Comey was indicted for allegedly lying during a 2020 congressional testimony regarding media leaks. A federal judge dismissed the case pretrial after ruling that the Trump-appointed attorney overseeing the prosecution, Lindsey Halligan, had been unlawfully appointed. The DOJ is currently appealing the dismissal.

2. Seashell Social Media Case (Pending): A second case remains active in North Carolina. Prosecutors charged Comey with making threats against the president after he posted an Instagram photo of beach seashells arranged to spell "86 47". 

The government argues "86" is slang meaning to "get rid of" and constituted a threat against the 47th president, Donald Trump. Comey's defense team has filed motions to dismiss the case.

Links:



https://www.google.com/search?q=James+Comey+charged+for+a+third+time+by+the+Trump+administration&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

re The Two Dan Sullivan Controversy: Alaska Election 2026

Whether the challenger, Daniel J. Sullivan Jr., is running intentionally to cause voter confusion is the central point of contention in this election, with starkly opposing viewpoints held by his critics and the candidate himself.

The Case and Accusations 
of Intentional Confusion

Critics and Republican organizations argue that his candidacy is a calculated “spoiler” or “decoy” campaign designed specifically to siphon votes from the incumbent. Those who believe his intent is to mislead voters point to several factors:

- Initial Actions: When he first entered the race, he requested to appear on the ballot simply as “Dan Sullivan.” He also initially registered as a Republican right before filing to run, despite later switching to “undeclared.”

- Campaign Presentation: His early campaign website prominently featured the slogan “Dan Sullivan Challenges Dan Sullivan for US Senate Seat.” Critics also noted similarities between his early digital presence and the incumbent’s branding.

- Political Background: Critics point out that he has no prior political experience, had previously voted for Democrats like Mary Peltola, and hired a political consultant with ties to Democratic campaigns.

- State Election Board’s Initial Finding: The Alaska Division of Elections initially disqualified him in June, explicitly stating they found a “serious risk of voter misunderstanding” and a lack of “good faith” in his initial filing.

The Candidate’s Defense 
of a Good-Faith Campaign

Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. and his legal representation strongly deny these allegations, maintaining that he is running a legitimate, independent campaign. His defense rests on the following points:

- Procedural Right: He asserts that as an Alaskan citizen who meets all constitutional age and residency requirements, he has a legal right to run for office under his own name regardless of who else is on the ballot.

- Stated Motivation: He states that his motivation stems from being a retired elementary school teacher and blue-collar worker who is genuinely dissatisfied with the political status quo and the incumbent’s 12-year tenure.

- Judicial Rulings: The Alaska Superior Court and the Alaska Supreme Court both overturned the state’s initial disqualification. The state judiciary affirmed his right to be on the ballot, ruling that under Alaska election law, a candidate’s underlying motivations are legally irrelevant as long as they properly fulfill the statutory filing procedures.

- Voter Intelligence: Sullivan Jr. has expressed faith in the electorate, publicly stating that “Alaskan voters are smart” and capable of telling the two candidates apart using the ballot’s descriptive markers.

Resolution by Ballot Design

Because the courts ruled he cannot be removed based on suspected intent, election officials instead modified the ballot layout to mitigate any potential confusion. The final general election ballot distinguishes the two candidates by listing the incumbent by his preferred shortened first name, middle initial, party affiliation, and the word “Incumbent” (Dan S. Sullivan), while listing the challenger by his full first name, middle initial, suffix, and no party label (Daniel J. Sullivan Jr.).

Perspective and Core Arguments

Perspective| Core Arguments Supporting the Claim| Primary Evidence Cited
Critics / Republican Lawsuit| The candidacy is a coordinated “dirty trick” designed to dilute incumbent votes.| Late party switching, copycat campaign slogans, links to opposition consultants, and initially requesting an identical ballot name.

The Candidate / State Courts| The campaign is a good-faith effort by an independent citizen exercising his constitutional right to run.| Fulfillment of all legal filing requirements, a distinct blue-collar platform, and state Supreme Court rulings protecting ballot access.

Links

- Google search: Two Dan Sullivans in the Alaska election

Monday, October 26, 2026

Could lead to a new scam: Trump Offers $1 Million Reward to Anyone Who Reports Voter Fraud .with conviction

Can you imagine the schemers already at work to get a million ? 



President Donald Trump announced on Monday, October 26, 2026, that he is offering a $1 million reward to anyone who reports voter fraud that leads to an arrest and conviction. The announcement applies to reported fraud from past elections as well as the upcoming 2026 midterm elections.

Key Details of the Announcement
- The Post: Trump wrote on social media: "Anybody reporting Voter Fraud in the past Elections, or the upcoming 2026 Midterm Election, will be paid $1,000,000 upon the arrest and conviction of those that created the Fraud!"
- Timing: The announcement comes exactly eight days before the November 3, 2026, midterm elections.

Missing Technicalities and Funding Sources
Media outlets and critics have highlighted several unresolved questions regarding the logistics of the proposal:
- Source of Funds: Trump did not specify where the money for these payments would come from, and it remains unclear if the rewards would be funded personally, through campaign donations, or via federal mechanisms.
- White House Response: A White House spokesperson declined to offer further clarifying details about the program, referring reporters directly back to Trump’s social media post.
- Reporting Mechanism: The administration has not yet provided instructions or established an official framework detailing exactly how citizens are supposed to submit fraud accusations to qualify for the bounty.

Context and Broader Initiatives
The offer is part of a larger, ongoing effort by the Trump administration to focus heavily on election integrity and fraud prevention. Trump continues to champion the SAVE America Act—legislation aimed at mandating voter ID at the ballot box and requiring proof of citizenship to register.

Additionally, this bounty follows a separate program introduced by the administration just five days prior on October 21, 2026. Led by Vice President JD Vance, that separate $25 million anti-corruption program offers a 1% whistleblower commission to citizens who report the theft of taxpayer dollars and government entitlement fraud via a newly launched platform, fraud.gov.




https://www.google.com/search?q=Trump+Offers+%241+Million+Reward+to+Anyone+Who+Reports+Voter+Fraud+Upon+Arrest+and+Conviction+of+Fraudsters&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

Sunday, October 25, 2026

"Trump’s border chief defends planned wall in Texas’ Big Bend"

"
Trump’s border chief defends planned wall in Texas’ Big Bend despite court-ordered pause
Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Rodney Scott said fortifying borders was “non-negotiable” despite bipartisan opposition to the Big Bend plan.."



https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/trumps-border-chief-defends-wall-plans-texas-big-bend-court-setback-rcna605211 

Saturday, October 24, 2026

"Iran's Kill Plots Reach 'Advanced Stages,' but Trump Has a Message: 'Little Epic Fury - " how about Big Epic Fury II 💥

President Donald Trump warned Iran that the U.S. could launch another little Epic Fury—referring to the initial military operation Operation Epic Fury—following a U.S. intelligence memo warning that Iranian lethal plotting against American personnel has reached advanced stages.

Key Developments
Intelligence Warning: Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton sent an October 23 memo to Secretary of State Marco Rubio stating that Iran has substantially increased efforts to target U.S. personnel and diplomats in the Middle East and other countries.

Embassy Drawdowns: The U.S. State Department is reducing staffing at four Middle East embassies and ordering departures of non-essential personnel and families in response to the heightened threats from Iran and Iran-backed Houthi attacks.

Trump’s Warning: Speaking at a campaign rally in Florida, President Trump warned Tehran to negotiate or face renewed military action, stating, We may do another little Epic Fury, or they'll agree.

Iran's Response: Iranian officials warned Washington not to play with fire and threatened counter-actions, while military spokespersons have dismissed U.S. strikes.
Links:
Axios: axios.com
The Times of India: indiatimes.com





https://www.google.com/search?q=Iran%27s+Kill+Plots+Reach+%27Advanced+Stages%2C%27+but+Trump+Has+a+Message%3A+%27Little+Epic+Fury&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

Friday, October 23, 2026

"Fifth Circuit gives Trump 'the most consequential ruling yet' on deportation"



The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled 10–7 that detained undocumented immigrants do not have a constitutional right to bond hearings under the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause.

The Core Ruling: Written by Judge Cory Wilson, the majority decision found that because unadmitted noncitizens have never been legally admitted to the United States, they are entitled only to the detention procedures established by Congress rather than additional constitutional bond proceedings.


Impact on ICE Detainees: The decision overturns lower-court rulings that had previously ordered bond hearings or releases for interior detainees, allowing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to hold individuals in mandatory detention pending removal.


Case Background: The lawsuit (Sosnava Rodriguez v. Ortega) stemmed from the detention of three men in Texas who were arrested during routine traffic stops and denied bond hearings despite living in the U.S. for over a decade.


Dissenting Opinions: Seven judges dissented, with judges including Dana Douglas and Stephen Higginson arguing that long-term interior residents historically possessed rights to bond consideration unless proven to be a flight risk or danger.

National Split: The ruling deepens a growing federal circuit split, contrasting with decisions from circuits like the Second Circuit, which have ruled that ICE detainees must be afforded the opportunity to seek release on bond.



https://www.google.com/search?q=Fifth+Circuit+gives+Trump+%27the+most+consequential+ruling+yet%27+on+deportations%0ACARLOS+GARCIA%0AOCTOBER+23%2C+2026&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

"President Trump Reacts to Arrest of FBI Officials Involved in Hunter Biden Laptop Investigation Who Admitted to “Running a Shadow Government - Google Search

Former FBI officials Nikki Cole Floris and Bradley Benavides were arrested and charged with making false statements to Congress regarding their involvement in the Hunter Biden laptop investigation.

Case Details & Charges

- The Defendants: Nikki Floris (former deputy assistant director leading the FBI's Foreign Influence Task Force) and Bradley Benavides (former section chief of the task force) surrendered on federal arrest warrants.

- The Charges: Each faces one count of making false statements under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 for allegedly lying to the House Judiciary Committee in 2023.

- The Allegations: Prosecutors and FBI Director Kash Patel stated that the pair concealed the task force's engagement with the Hunter Biden laptop probe, with Floris previously noted in internal 2020 communications as privately remarking that she was "running a shadow government across the FBI at this point".

- Defense Response: Attorneys for Floris called the charges "nonsense" and politically motivated, asserting that she served as a dedicated intelligence officer for nearly two decades and was falsely accused on the say-so of politicians ahead of an election.

Reactions & Official Statements

- FBI Director Kash Patel: Announced the arrests on X (formerly Twitter), stating, "Weaponization will never be tolerated at this FBI. We have already dismantled the corrupt CR-15 squad that engaged in political weaponization targeting their opponents, including President Trump — and anyone who abuses their position of public trust will be held accountable".

- U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro: Stated in official remarks via the Department of Justice Portal that "when senior FBI agents lie to Congress believing they are above the law, it's time to bring the hammer of justice down on them".
- President Trump and Administration

 Context: President Trump and his conservative allies have long spotlighted declassified 2020 internal exchanges referencing the "shadow government" remark as evidence of partisan interference and suppression of information during the 2020 election cycle.

Links

- Department of Justice Press Release: https://justice.gov
- Newsweek Article on Kash Patel Statement: https://newsweek.com




https://www.google.com/search?q=President+Trump+Reacts+to+Arrest+of+FBI+Officials+Involved+in+Hunter+Biden+Laptop+Investigation+Who+Admitted+to+%E2%80%9CRunning+a+Shadow+Government&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

Thursday, October 22, 2026

👍 "Trump Announces 1% Commission To Reward People Who Expose Fraud -

On October 20, 2026, President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance announced the launch of the Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program, a new $25 million federal initiative designed to reward citizens who report fraud in U.S. government programs. 

Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump stated that the program would offer tipsters an unlimited 1% commission on the amount of recovered fraud. However, official program details published by the Justice Department and Treasury Department initially framed the standard reward structure as a cash prize ranging from $10,000 to $30,000 for actionable tips leading to criminal charges.

Key Details of the Program

The Portal: Tips can be submitted by ordinary citizens and professional journalists through a newly created website at fraud.gov.

Trump as Arbitrator: In cases where multiple people claim credit for the same tip, Trump announced that he will personally serve as the final, binding arbitrator to determine who receives the money.

Eligibility Constraints: Simply submitting a tip does not guarantee a payout; the tip must directly lead to a criminal conviction or a significant federal enforcement action.

Scale of Rewards: While the Justice Department maps out initial caps up to $30,000, officials noted that whistleblowers could be eligible for much larger rewards if their tips result in massive financial penalties or asset forfeitures.

Divergent Perspectives and Context

According to Vance, who heads the administration's anti-fraud task force, the initiative targets the abuse of tax dollars across programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. The administration claims to have already identified $260 billion in unverified government fraud. 

Vance noted that 99% of the fraud being uncovered by his task force falls outside the scope of preexisting whistleblower mechanisms like the False Claims Act of 1863, which traditionally compensates whistleblowers with 15% to 30% of recovered funds specifically from federal contract fraud.

Critics, including the Project on Government Oversight, have questioned the structure of the program. Policy counsel expressed concern that generating public tips in this manner could lack consistent investigatory standards and could potentially be used to target political opponents rather than systematically rooting out corporate or government institutional waste.

Links:
- Portal URL: https://fraud.gov


https://www.google.com/search?q=Trump+Announces+1%25+Commission+To+Reward+People+Who+Expose+Fraud&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

"Kristi Noem 'Tech Blunder' While at DHS May 'Take Years to Fix' — As Department Was Unable to Use Wiretaps for Months Following 'Inadvertent' Decision -" Google Search

She didn't flip the switch yourself so you can't say that she's personally at fault but she probably didn't know enough to know that it might make such a big difference. so then you have to ask was she the right person for the job and who chose her for the job and did Trump make bad decision  based on cronyism  ? probably

Let's face it, a lot of decisions for positions of leadership in the White House administration are based on cronyism and you need that loyalty of course because previously Trump would assign people that became disloyal or were never actually loyal, but at the same time you want to have loyal people who have the technical knowledge about the job as well. 



An inadvertent change to an internet provider by Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) in April 2025 disrupted ICE's wiretap capabilities for months and may take years to fully fix.

Key Details of the Blunder

- The Cause: In April 2025, three months after former Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem took office, HSI inadvertently changed its internet provider. 
- The Technical Impact: The switch assigned the agency a new internet address, forcing them to sever and rebuild connections with roughly 50 telecommunications providers.
- Operational Fallout: The disruption resulted in months of downtime for authorized wiretaps, coinciding with an 80% collapse in wiretap usage reported by DHS investigators during Noem’s tenure.
- Recovery Timeline: Internal procurement and law enforcement assessments indicate that fully restoring and recovering from the network architecture failure could take years. 

Broader Context

- Tenure and Ouster: Noem served as DHS Secretary from January 2025 until March 2026, when she was removed by President Donald Trump following controversies that included a $220 million advertising campaign and aggressive enforcement operations in Minnesota.
- Subsequent Claims: Following her departure, Noem alleged that DHS staff had secretly installed spyware on her government-issued devices, a claim she stated was uncovered with assistance from Elon Musk's team.



https://www.google.com/search?q=KRISTI+NOEM%0AKristi+Noem+%27Tech+Blunder%27+While+at+DHS+May+%27Take+Years+to+Fix%27+%E2%80%94+As+Department+Was+Unable+to+Use+Wiretaps+for+Months+Following+%27Inadvertent%27+Decision&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

Saturday, October 17, 2026

👍"They Will All Go to Jail For a Long Period of Time!!!” – Trump and DOJ Vow to Jail Los Angeles County Election Officials Who Tabulate Ballots of Non-Citizens - Google Search



President Donald Trump and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) warned California and Los Angeles County election officials that they could face criminal prosecution and imprisonment if they tabulate mail ballots from a list of more than 20,000 alleged noncitizens. 

Key Details of the Dispute

- The DOJ Demand: The DOJ gave California officials a 48-hour deadline to review a list of over 20,000 individuals flagged as potential noncitizens and withhold or segregate their mail ballots. 
- The Lawsuit: On Thursday, October 15, 2026, the DOJ officially filed a lawsuit against the state of California to block the counting of these disputed ballots.
- The Warning Letter: Acting U.S. Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter sent a letter warning local officials—including Los Angeles County Assistant Counsel Peter Bollinger—that knowingly facilitating noncitizen voting is a federal crime.
- Trump’s Statement: President Trump shared the DOJ letter on Truth Social with the comment: "They will all go to jail for a long period of time!!!".
- California’s Response: California Secretary of State Shirley Weber and county officials rejected the demands, noting that the state is within the federal 90-day "quiet period" before an election that restricts purging voter rolls, and criticized the timing as an administrative emergency created by the federal government.

https://www.google.com/search?q=They+Will+All+Go+to+Jail+For+a+Long+Period+of+Time%21%21%21%E2%80%9D+%E2%80%93+Trump+and+DOJ+Vow+to+Jail+Los+Angeles+County+Election+Officials+Who+Tabulate+Ballots+of+Non-Citizens&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

Friday, October 16, 2026

Is the new White House Press Secretary Katie Zacharia a lawyer ? Controversy . Yawn 🥱. Lib media playing gotcha👎


White House Press Secretary Katie Zacharia has confirmed she never passed a bar exam after media scrutiny revealed she failed the California bar exam in 2011 and holds no law license in any U.S. state. 

While both Zacharia and President Donald Trump have publicly referred to her as a lawyer or attorney, Zacharia addressed the mounting controversy on October 15, 2026, defending her use of the title.

Summary of Zacharia's Defense

- The Lawyer vs. Attorney Distinction: In interviews with conservative media outlets and The New York Times, Zacharia argued that she intentionally avoided calling herself an attorney at law. She claimed she consulted legal experts and the president of Pepperdine University (where she earned her law degree), who allegedly told her it was acceptable to use the term lawyer if she was providing legal analysis rather than legal advice.

- The Bar Exam Failure: Zacharia acknowledged that she failed the California bar exam in 2011, explaining that she was distracted at the time by upcoming plans to get married and relocate to China. 

- The China Gaffe: During her debut briefing, when asked where she had passed the bar, Zacharia replied, "When I moved to China". This drew heavy criticism because foreign nationals are barred from taking China's legal qualification exam. Zacharia later clarified that she misunderstood the reporter's question due to loud helicopter noise outside, and maintained that she worked as an associate handling international transactions at a Chinese law firm with the appropriate credentials.

Context and Backlash

The White House has defended Zacharia, with Communications Director Steven Cheung describing her as uniquely qualified and whip smart. However, legal experts note that the terms lawyer and attorney are widely understood by the public to denote a licensed practitioner. Following her remarks, a public accountability nonprofit filed a formal complaint with the State Bar of California to investigate whether her self-representation violated state rules.

What people are saying

The public and media landscape is highly divided, with critics calling her transparency into question while supporters back her experience and academic credentials.

Links:
- The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com
- State Bar of California: https://www.calbar.ca.gov



https://www.google.com/search?q=White+House+Press+Secretary+Katie+Zacharia+Addresses+Claims+She+Lied+About+Being+a+Lawyer%0ABy+Jo&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

Thursday, October 15, 2026

"SKIES SET ABLAZE After Ukraine Bombs Massive Russian Oil Depot –2 Days After Zelensky Agreed to Trump’s Ceasefire

Allegedly agreed 

On October 11, 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump announced via Truth Social that an energy ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine was effective immediately, claiming both sides had agreed. 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stated the announcement was "news to me," though he indicated Kyiv would respect it if Moscow did the same.

 The Kremlin did not officially confirm the deal, and Russian forces continued striking Ukrainian power and energy infrastructure almost immediately.

After pausing attacks on Russian energy sites for a brief period, Zelenskyy declared the truce dead, stating, The block on attacking refineries is out. We're done, following continuous Russian bombardments on Ukrainian energy facilities.

Ukrainian long-range drone operations targeted Russian oil and energy infrastructure in regions such as Belgorod (including Valuyki) and Ryazan, amid heightened tensions over U.S. efforts to broker a Russian diesel export arrangement and lower domestic fuel prices.



https://www.google.com/search?q=SKIES+SET+ABLAZE+After+Ukraine+Bombs+Massive+Oil+Depot+in+Valuyki%2C+Russia+%E2%80%93+Two+Days+After+Zelensky+Agreed+to+Trump%E2%80%99s+Energy+Ceasefire&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

Monday, October 12, 2026

President Trump Gives Shout Out to Sophie Cunningham at Ohio Rally:

Yes, Sophie Cunningham is a highly accurate shooter. During her 2026 season with the Indiana Fever, she was one of the premier long-range threats in the WNBA, making 41.9% of her 3-point attempts. Her 65.4% true-shooting percentage reflects exceptional scoring efficiency, even while playing primarily as a reserve player. 

), 
The fact that Donald Trump minimized her scoring ability at his Ohio campaign rally is precisely why his remarks generated significant backlash.

The Core of the Controversy

• The "Backhanded" Compliment: Sports fans and analysts criticized the remarks because Trump explicitly told the crowd you would want her on a team "not to help you with points, but to help you with attendance." By framing her value entirely around her looks and her drawing power among male spectators, critics argued he completely dismissed her legitimate basketball credentials. [1] (

/
• Disproportionate Focus: Commentators noted that reducing an elite professional athlete's value to ticket sales and appearance—especially someone who ranks near the top of the league in 3-point accuracy—is a reductive trope that women's sports advocates have fought against for decades. 


Her On-Court Value

While her overall scoring average was 7.9 points per game in 2026 due to her role coming off the bench, her actual impact on the floor goes beyond raw volume: 

• Spacing: Her 41.9% mark from deep forces opposing defenses to guard her tightly, opening up the paint for teammates.

• Clutch Production: She maintains a high offensive ceiling, evidenced by explosive performances like a 24-point game featuring six 3-pointers earlier in the season.

 
Ultimately, while Trump focused on her cultural popularity and ability to drive gate revenue, basketball analysts emphasize that any WNBA team pursuing her in free agency is doing so primarily for her elite floor-spacing and perimeter shooting. 




https://www.google.com/search?q=President+Trump+Gives+Shout+Out+to+Sophie+Cunningham+at+Ohio+Rally%3A+%E2%80%9CWe+Like+Sophie+Cunningham%E2%80%A6+You+Probably+Wouldn%E2%80%99t+Mind+Her+on+Your+Team+%E2%80%93+to+Help+with+Attendance&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new